Atlanta, Georgia – Once it was discovered that the Atlanta Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued at least 50 subpoenas for financial documents without following Georgia state law, the office came under investigation. Reports state that these subpoenas broke Georgia OCGA 7-1-360 (3) by not giving those whose documents were being summoned required prior notifications.
Any entity requesting subpoenas for personal financial records under Georgia’s legal system must first provide the impacted individuals prior written notice. This legislation lets people object or get ready for the publication of their private financial data, therefore safeguarding their rights and guaranteeing transparency.
Recent studies have found that the OIG disregarded these conditions. The OIG has highlighted serious privacy issues and due process abuses by gathering financial records without initial notice. Because the OIG’s subpoenas forbade financial institutions from notifying account holders of the steps being taken against them, this monitoring also put the City of Atlanta at danger of legal liabilities.
“The failure to provide notice to the depositor…is not legal and it places the City of Atlanta at risk for potential liability for this intentional violation of Georgia’s Banking and Finance Laws,” City Attorney Patrise Perkins-Hooker wrote in a cease-and-desist letter issued to the OIG’s office early Monday. The implications of this violation are significant, as unauthorized access to financial records can lead to misuse of sensitive information and compromise individuals’ financial security.
In response to the backlash, the OIG has acknowledged the need for change The office said it is working on changing its policies and practices on subpoena issuing to financial institutions. The OIG also intends to change its standard forms to guarantee adherence to the necessary notifications, therefore matching future activities with banking laws.
The debate has spurred more general conversations on OIG governance and control. Concerns have been expressed by Mayor Andre Dickens’ government, city staff, union officials from AFSCME and PACE. They contend that the OIG’s actions violated employee rights and, in other cases, completely ignored them.
“Throughout this process, we have continually said that while there is no place for illegal or unethical behavior in the City of Atlanta, there also is no place for the OIG to conduct its business outside of the parameters set by law and policy,” said Odie Donald, Chief of Staff to Mayor Dickens. “No one is above the law. How the OIG conducts its duties is equally important as to why it exists in the first place.”
Read also: Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens names Adriane Jefferson to lead Atlanta’s Office of Cultural Affairs
Following the discovery, the City of Atlanta released the following statement:
In response to employee concerns and a taskforce comprised of legal experts, the City Council took the first step to strengthening ethics in City government by voting unanimously to advance legislation that establishes clear protocols for the Office of Inspector General. A review conducted by the City’s Law Department revealed the OIGs office had violated State law at least 50 times by issuing illegal subpoenas. The OIG was forced to update their policies after receiving a cease-and-desist letter from the City Atto outlining the illegal behavior. The legislation will move back to the Committee on Council and Full Council in two weeks for final adoption.
Moving forward, the Atlanta City Council is set to consider an ordinance that aims to ensure better oversight of the OIG. The proposed law is meant to protect employee and citizen rights to due process and preserve the integrity of investigations. Atlanta’s dedication to ethical government and open operations remains top priority as officials try to address these issues.
 issued at least 50 subpoenas for financial documents without following Georgia state law){kind=link}